[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] memcg: Add swappiness to cgroup2
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 02:56:40PM +0800, teawater <> wrote:
> For example, an application does a lot of file access work in a
> memory-constrained environment.
> [...]
> Both of them are extreme examples.
The examples are quite generic. Do cgroup v2 controls really prevent
handling such workloads appropriately?

Besides that, note that per-cgroup swappiness as used in v1 cannot be
simply transferred into v2 because, it's a concept that doesn't take
into account cgroup hierarchies (how would parent's swappiness affect
children? what would swappiness on inner nodes mean?).

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-03 10:49    [W:0.060 / U:17.784 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site