lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/6] fixes for atmel-hlcdc
Hi Lee.

> > > ("drm/atmel-hlcdc: allow selecting a higher pixel-clock than requested")
> > >
> > > Claudiu Beznea (5):
> > > drm: atmel-hlcdc: use double rate for pixel clock only if supported
> > > drm: atmel-hlcdc: enable clock before configuring timing engine
> >
> > > mfd: atmel-hlcdc: add struct device member to struct
> > > atmel_hlcdc_regmap
> > > mfd: atmel-hlcdc: return in case of error
> >
> > Would it be OK to apply the to drm-misc-next, or shal they go in via
> > your mfd tree?
>
> How are they related to the other patches? Do they have build-time
> dependencies on any of the other patches, or vice versa?
No build time dependencies.

But from the description of "atmel-hlcdc: return in case of error":
"
For HLCDC timing engine configurations bit ATMEL_HLCDC_SIP of
ATMEL_HLCDC_SR needs to be polled before applying new config.
"
I get that changing timing for the HLCDC may fail if these
patches are not applied.
So it is only to have updated hlcdc support in drm-misc-next
for further testing.

Sam

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-02 17:22    [W:0.042 / U:19.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site