lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 1/6] Check gpio pin number and use binary search in mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup()
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 5:42 AM Light Hsieh <light.hsieh@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> 1. Check if gpio pin number is in valid range to prevent from get invalid
> pointer 'desc' in the following code:
> desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio];
>
> 2. Improve mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup()
> 2.1 Modify mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup() to use binary search for accelerating
> search.
> 2.2 Correct message after the following check fail:
> if (hw->soc->reg_cal && hw->soc->reg_cal[field].range) {
> rc = &hw->soc->reg_cal[field];
> The original message is:
> "Not support field %d for pin %d (%s)\n"
> However, the check is on soc chip level, not on pin level yet.
> So the message is corrected as:
> "Not support field %d for this soc\n"
>
> Change-Id: I498a18df73e6a693e0e35635d5b92b8dc9c063ac

If removing the change-ids, add a prefix "pinctrl: mediatek:" to the
subject, and proper signed-off-by tags,
and then the overall looks good to me.

> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> index 20e1c89..d63e05e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> @@ -68,32 +68,44 @@ static int mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> {
> const struct mtk_pin_field_calc *c, *e;
> const struct mtk_pin_reg_calc *rc;
> + int start = 0, end, check;
> + bool found = false;
> u32 bits;
>
> if (hw->soc->reg_cal && hw->soc->reg_cal[field].range) {
> rc = &hw->soc->reg_cal[field];
> } else {
> dev_dbg(hw->dev,
> - "Not support field %d for pin %d (%s)\n",
> - field, desc->number, desc->name);
> + "Not support field %d for this soc\n", field);
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
>
> + end = rc->nranges - 1;
> c = rc->range;
> e = c + rc->nranges;
>
> - while (c < e) {
> - if (desc->number >= c->s_pin && desc->number <= c->e_pin)
> + while (start <= end) {
> + check = (start + end) >> 1;
> + if (desc->number >= rc->range[check].s_pin
> + && desc->number <= rc->range[check].e_pin) {
> + found = true;
> + break;
> + } else if (start == end)
> break;
> - c++;
> + else if (desc->number < rc->range[check].s_pin)
> + end = check - 1;
> + else
> + start = check + 1;
> }
>
> - if (c >= e) {
> + if (!found) {
> dev_dbg(hw->dev, "Not support field %d for pin = %d (%s)\n",
> field, desc->number, desc->name);
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
>
> + c = rc->range + check;
> +
> if (c->i_base > hw->nbase - 1) {
> dev_err(hw->dev,
> "Invalid base for field %d for pin = %d (%s)\n",
> @@ -182,6 +194,9 @@ int mtk_hw_set_value(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw, const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + if (value < 0 || value > pf.mask)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> if (!pf.next)
> mtk_rmw(hw, pf.index, pf.offset, pf.mask << pf.bitpos,
> (value & pf.mask) << pf.bitpos);
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> index 923264d..3e13ae7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> int val, val2, err, reg, ret = 1;
> const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
>
> + if (pin >= hw->soc->npins)
> + return -EINVAL;
> desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[pin];
>
> switch (param) {
> @@ -206,6 +208,10 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
> int err = 0;
> u32 reg;
>
> + if (pin >= hw->soc->npins) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto err;
> + }
> desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[pin];
>
> switch ((u32)param) {
> @@ -693,6 +699,9 @@ static int mtk_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio)
> const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
> int value, err;
>
> + if (gpio > hw->soc->npins)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio];
>
> err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DIR, &value);
> @@ -708,6 +717,9 @@ static int mtk_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio)
> const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
> int value, err;
>
> + if (gpio > hw->soc->npins)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio];
>
> err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DI, &value);
> @@ -722,6 +734,9 @@ static void mtk_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio, int value)
> struct mtk_pinctrl *hw = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
>
> + if (gpio > hw->soc->npins)
> + return;
> +
> desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio];
>
> mtk_hw_set_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DO, !!value);
> @@ -729,12 +744,22 @@ static void mtk_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio, int value)
>
> static int mtk_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio)
> {
> + struct mtk_pinctrl *hw = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +
> + if (gpio > hw->soc->npins)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> return pinctrl_gpio_direction_input(chip->base + gpio);
> }
>
> static int mtk_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio,
> int value)
> {
> + struct mtk_pinctrl *hw = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +
> + if (gpio > hw->soc->npins)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> mtk_gpio_set(chip, gpio, value);
>
> return pinctrl_gpio_direction_output(chip->base + gpio);
> --
> 1.8.1.1.dirty

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-17 09:31    [W:0.052 / U:5.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site