[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/3] ata: ahci_brcm: Follow-up changes for BCM7216
On 1/16/20 9:44 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 1/8/2020 1:25 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>> Hi Florian,
>> On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 10:30 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Hi Jens, Philipp,
>>> These three patches are a follow-up to my previous series titled: ata:
>>> ahci_brcm: Fixes and new device support.
>>> After submitting the BCM7216 RESCAL reset driver, Philipp the reset
>>> controller maintained indicated that the reset line should be self
>>> de-asserting and so reset_control_reset() should be used instead.
>>> These three patches update the driver in that regard. It would be great if
>>> you could apply those and get them queued up for 5.6 since they are
>>> directly related to the previous series.
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - introduced a preliminary patch making use of the proper reset control
>>> API in order to manage the optional reset controller line
>>> - updated patches after introducing that preliminary patch
>> The third patch could be simplified by storing the rescal reset control
>> in a separate struct member and relying on the optional reset control
>> API more. This is just a suggestion though, the series looks fine as-is.
>> Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <>
> Thanks! Jens is that good for you?

Can you re-send against the current branch and include the reviewed-bys
from here as well?

Jens Axboe

 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-17 05:52    [W:0.093 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site