lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] idle: fix spelling mistake "iterrupts" -> "interrupts"

Peter,

I guess you could just pull this into one of your queues.

Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

-- Steve


On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 21:56:04 -0500
Hewenliang <hewenliang4@huawei.com> wrote:

> There is a spelling misake in comments of cpuidle_idle_call. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hewenliang <hewenliang4@huawei.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/idle.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> index f65ef1e2f204..d29ebe8c63dd 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
> /*
> * Suspend-to-idle ("s2idle") is a system state in which all user space
> * has been frozen, all I/O devices have been suspended and the only
> - * activity happens here and in iterrupts (if any). In that case bypass
> + * activity happens here and in interrupts (if any). In that case bypass
> * the cpuidle governor and go stratight for the deepest idle state
> * available. Possibly also suspend the local tick and the entire
> * timekeeping to prevent timer interrupts from kicking us out of idle

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-13 22:05    [W:0.085 / U:4.684 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site