lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: bd718x7: Yamlify and add BD71850
On Wed, 08 Jan 2020, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:

> Hi de Ho Peeps,
>
> On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 09:37 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 7:01 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2019, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Convert ROHM bd71837 and bd71847 PMIC binding text docs to yaml.
> > > > Split
> > > > the binding document to two separate documents (own documents for
> > > > BD71837
> > > > and BD71847) as they have different amount of regulators. This
> > > > way we can
> > > > better enforce the node name check for regulators. ROHM is also
> > > > providing
> > > > BD71850 - which is almost identical to BD71847 - main difference
> > > > is some
> > > > initial regulator states. The BD71850 can be driven by same
> > > > driver and it
> > > > has same buck/LDO setup as BD71847 - add it to BD71847 binding
> > > > document and
> > > > introduce compatible for it.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com
> > > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > changes since v1:
> > > > - constrains to short and long presses.
> > > > - reworded commit message to shorten a line exceeding 75 chars
> > > > - added 'additionalProperties: false'
> > > > - removed 'clock-names' from example node
> > > >
> > > > .../bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-pmic.txt | 90 -------
> > > > .../bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-pmic.yaml | 236
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > .../bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71847-pmic.yaml | 222
> > > > ++++++++++++++++
> > > > .../regulator/rohm,bd71837-regulator.txt | 162 ------------
> > > > .../regulator/rohm,bd71837-regulator.yaml | 103 ++++++++
> > > > .../regulator/rohm,bd71847-regulator.yaml | 97 +++++++
> > >
> > > Can you split these out per-subsystem, so that I can apply the MFD
> > > changes please?
> >
> > That's not going to work any more. The MFD binding references the
> > child bindings and the complete example(s) resides in the MFD
> > binding.
>
> So is it Ok to take all of these in MFD tree - or how should this be
> done? Can Rob get them in after acks from Lee/Mark?

I'm happy to take all of them, but will need Mark's Ack.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-13 11:49    [W:0.058 / U:1.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site