[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 0/8] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 11:47 AM Arnd Bergmann <> wrote:
> Isn't the read_barrier_depends() the only reason for actually needing
> the temporary local variable that must not be volatile?
> If you make alpha provide its own READ_ONCE() as the first
> step, it would seem that the rest of the series gets much easier
> as the others can go back to the simple statement from your

Hmm.. The union still would cause that "take the address of a volatile
thing on the stack" problem, wouldn't it? And that was what caused
most of the issues.

I think the _real_ issue is how KASAN forces that odd pair of inline
functions in order to have the annotations on the accesses.


 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-10 21:15    [W:0.514 / U:3.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site