lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] mtd: nand: spi: rework detect procedure for different read id op
Hi Boris,

Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> wrote on Fri, 10 Jan
2020 09:04:22 +0100:

> On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:34:28 +0800
> Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:59 PM Boris Brezillon
> > <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > + ret = spinand_read_id_op(spinand, 1, 0, id);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + ret = spinand_manufacturer_match(spinand,
> > > > + SPINAND_READID_METHOD_OPCODE_ADDR);
> > > > + if (!ret)
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = spinand_read_id_op(spinand, 0, 1, id);
> > >
> > > Hm, we should probably do only one of each read_id and iterate over all
> > > manufacturers/chips each time instead of doing 3 read_ids per
> > > manufacturer.
> >
> > This actually do the former instead of the latter. Maybe the function
> > names are a bit
> > misleading. spinand_manufacturer_match iterates over all manufacturers
> > in one call,
> > and spinand_manufacturer_detect is called once in spinand_detect.
> > Do you have suggestions on function naming?
>
> Maybe you can just inline the content of this function in
> spinand_detect().

Actually I found that part clear enough, I would keep it as is, out of
the spinand_detect() function as long as there is no actual reason to
merge them?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-10 09:10    [W:0.033 / U:3.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site