lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 15/21] ASoC: tegra: Add fallback implementation for audio mclk
From
Date

On 1/10/20 3:02 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> 11.01.2020 01:13, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>> On 1/10/20 2:05 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>
>>>
>>> 10.01.2020 20:04, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>> On 1/9/20 10:52 AM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>>>> On 1/7/20 10:28 PM, Sameer Pujar wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/8/2020 11:18 AM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/7/20 9:34 PM, Sameer Pujar wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/8/2020 9:55 AM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>>>>>>>> mclk is from clk_out_1 which is part of Tegra PMC block and pmc
>>>>>>>>> clocks
>>>>>>>>> are moved to Tegra PMC driver with pmc as clock provider and using
>>>>>>>>> pmc
>>>>>>>>> clock ids.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> New device tree uses clk_out_1 from pmc clock provider.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, this patch adds implementation for mclk fallback to extern1
>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>> retrieving mclk returns -ENOENT to be backward compatible of new
>>>>>>>>> device
>>>>>>>>> tree with older kernels.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> sound/soc/tegra/tegra_asoc_utils.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/sound/soc/tegra/tegra_asoc_utils.c
>>>>>>>>> b/sound/soc/tegra/tegra_asoc_utils.c
>>>>>>>>> index 9cfebef74870..9a5f81039491 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/sound/soc/tegra/tegra_asoc_utils.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/sound/soc/tegra/tegra_asoc_utils.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -183,7 +183,16 @@ int tegra_asoc_utils_init(struct
>>>>>>>>> tegra_asoc_utils_data *data,
>>>>>>>>> data->clk_cdev1 = devm_clk_get(dev, "mclk");
>>>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR(data->clk_cdev1)) {
>>>>>>>>> dev_err(data->dev, "Can't retrieve clk cdev1\n");
>>>>>>>> This error print can be moved inside below if, when this actually
>>>>>>>> meant to be an error condition.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Want to show error even if mclk retrieval returns ENOENT to clearly
>>>>>>> indicate mclk does not exist along with message of falling back to
>>>>>>> extern1.
>>>>>> Yes, but falling back essentially means 'mclk' is not available and
>>>>>> fallback print is not an error.
>>>>>> Not a major issue though, you can consider updating. Otherwise LGTM.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Will update
>>>>>>>>> - return PTR_ERR(data->clk_cdev1);
>>>>>>>>> + if (PTR_ERR(data->clk_cdev1) != -ENOENT)
>>>>>>>>> + return PTR_ERR(data->clk_cdev1);
>>>>>>>>> + /* Fall back to extern1 */
>>>>>>>>> + data->clk_cdev1 = devm_clk_get(dev, "extern1");
>>>>>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(data->clk_cdev1)) {
>>>>>>>>> + dev_err(data->dev, "Can't retrieve clk extern1\n");
>>>>>>>>> + return PTR_ERR(data->clk_cdev1);
>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + dev_err(data->dev, "Falling back to extern1\n");
>>>>>>>> This can be a info print?
>>>>> Will use dev_info
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>> /*
>>>>> Dmitry/Rob, there was discussion in v3 regarding backporting mclk
>>>>> fallback.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dmitry wanted Rob to confirm on this
>>>>>
>>>>> I think openSUSE Leap could be one of those distros that use LTS kernel
>>>>> with newer device-trees, but that's not 100%. Maybe Rob could help
>>>>> clarifying that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dmitry/Rob, Can you please confirm if mclk fallback patch need
>>>>> backport to have new device tree work with old kernels?
>>>>>
>>>> Dmitry,
>>>>
>>>> Can you please confirm if we need to backport this mclk fallback patch?
>>>>
>>> Seems only T210 was making use of the CaR's TEGRA*_CLK_CLK_OUT_*, thus
>>> the backporting isn't needed.
>> Thanks Dmitry
>>> Also, please use 'git rebase --exec make ...' to make sure that all
>>> patches are compiling without problems. The removal of the legacy clock
>>> IDs should be done after the device-trees changes, otherwise it looks
>>> like DTBs compilation will fail. It's possible that the order of the
>>> patches could be changed if Thierry will chose to split this series into
>>> several pull requests, nevertheless all patches should compile and work
>>> in the original order.
>> OK, Will move patches of device tree updates to use new DT ID prior to
>> removal of old ID.
> Oh, wait. But then the newer device-trees won't work with the stable
> kernels, so it actually won't hurt to backport this change.
ok will add Fixes tag to have this mclk fallback patch backported.
>
> Secondly, please move the "Use device managed resource APIs to get the
> clock" after the ASoC patches with the stable tags, such that the stable
> patches could be applied cleanly.
OK
>
> Lastly, please separate the assigned-clocks change from the the audio
> mclk enable/disable into a standalone patch. These changes are not
> interdependent, unless I'm missing something.

But parent configuration when assigned-clock-parents are not in DT are
needed along with mclk enable

as we are removing audio clocks parent configuration and enabling them
together from clock driver.

So doesn't both parent configuration and enabling mclk together need to
be in same patch to match what we are removing from clock driver?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-11 00:15    [W:0.068 / U:1.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site