lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Add support for AM3517
From
Date
Hi Adam,

> Am 09.09.2019 um 17:45 schrieb Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>:
>
> The AM3517 only lists 600MHz @ 1.2V, but the revister values for

a small typo...

s/revister/register/

> 0x4830A204 = 1b86 802f, it seems like am3517 might be a derivative
> of the omap36 which has OPPs would be OPP50 (300 MHz) and OPP100
> (600 MHz).
>
> This patch simply enable adds the am3517 to the compatible table
> using the omap3630 structure instead of the 3430.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> index f2f58d689320..6b69fb1d6bdf 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> @@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ static int ti_cpufreq_setup_syscon_register(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data)
>
> static const struct of_device_id ti_cpufreq_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "ti,am33xx", .data = &am3x_soc_data, },
> + { .compatible = "ti,am3517", .data = &omap36xx_soc_data, },
> { .compatible = "ti,am43", .data = &am4x_soc_data, },
> { .compatible = "ti,dra7", .data = &dra7_soc_data },
> { .compatible = "ti,omap34xx", .data = &omap34xx_soc_data, },
> --
> 2.17.1
>

Looks good to me.

Should I include your two patches to my patch set (and resend)?
Or should we keep them separated?

BR and thanks,
Nikolaus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-09 20:14    [W:0.038 / U:2.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site