[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] Fix: trace sched switch start/stop racy updates
Peter Zijlstra <> wrote:
> Paulmck actually has an example of that somewhere; ISTR that particular
> case actually got fixed by GCC, but I'd really _love_ for some compiler
> people (both GCC and LLVM) to state that their respective compilers will
> not do load/store tearing for machine word sized load/stores.
> Without this written guarantee (which supposedly was in older GCC
> manuals but has since gone missing), I'm loathe to rely on it.

IIRC in that case gcc actually broke atomic writes even with a
volatile keyword. So even WRITE_ONCE wouldn't have saved us.

Email: Herbert Xu <>
Home Page:
PGP Key:

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-09 08:22    [W:0.136 / U:23.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site