lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] FBTFT: fb_agm1264k: usleep_range is preferred over udelay
Date
This patch fixes the issue:
FILE: drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c:88:
CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst
+ udelay(20);

Signed-off-by: Sreeram Veluthakkal <srrmvlt@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c
index eeeeec97ad27..2dece71fd3b5 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void reset(struct fbtft_par *par)
dev_dbg(par->info->device, "%s()\n", __func__);

gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.reset, 0);
- udelay(20);
+ usleep_range(20, 40);
gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.reset, 1);
mdelay(120);
}
--
2.17.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-09 03:26    [W:0.062 / U:1.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site