lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: iproc: Invalidate PAXB address mapping before programming it
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 02:55:19PM +0530, Abhishek Shah wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for the review. Please see my response inline:
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 2:08 PM Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 09:28:13AM +0530, Abhishek Shah wrote:
> > > Invalidate PAXB inbound/outbound address mapping each time before
> > > programming it. This is helpful for the cases where we need to
> > > reprogram inbound/outbound address mapping without resetting PAXB.
> > > kexec kernel is one such example.
> >
> > Why is this approach better than resetting the PAXB (I assume that's
> > the PCI controller IP)? Wouldn't resetting the PAXB address this issue,
> > and ensure that no other configuration is left behind?
> >
> We normally reset PAXB in the firmware(ATF). But for cases like kexec
> kernel boot,
> we do not execute any firmware code and directly boot into kernel.
>
> We could have done PAXB reset in the driver itself as you have suggested here.
> But note that this detail could vary for each SoC, because these
> registers are not part
> of PAXB register space itself, rather exists in a register space responsible for
> controlling power to various wrappers in PCIe IP. Normally, this kind
> of SoC specific
> details are handled in firmware itself, we don't bring them to driver level.

OK understood.

>
> > Or is this related to earlier boot stages loading firmware for the emulated
> > downstream endpoints (ep_is_internal)?
> >
> > Finally, in the case where ep_is_internal do you need to disable anything
> > prior to invalidating the mappings?
> >
> No, ep_is_internal is indicator for PAXC IP. It does not have
> mappings as in PAXB.

I think I meant !ep_is_internal. I.e. is there possibility of inbound traffic
prior to invalidating the mappings. I'd assume not, but that's an assumption.

Either way:

Reviewed-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>

>
>
> Regards,
> Abhishek
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Abhishek Shah <abhishek.shah@broadcom.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@broadcom.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Vikram Mysore Prakash <vikram.prakash@broadcom.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> > > index e3ca46497470..99a9521ba7ab 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> > > @@ -1245,6 +1245,32 @@ static int iproc_pcie_map_dma_ranges(struct iproc_pcie *pcie)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void iproc_pcie_invalidate_mapping(struct iproc_pcie *pcie)
> > > +{
> > > + struct iproc_pcie_ib *ib = &pcie->ib;
> > > + struct iproc_pcie_ob *ob = &pcie->ob;
> > > + int idx;
> > > +
> > > + if (pcie->ep_is_internal)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + if (pcie->need_ob_cfg) {
> > > + /* iterate through all OARR mapping regions */
> > > + for (idx = ob->nr_windows - 1; idx >= 0; idx--) {
> > > + iproc_pcie_write_reg(pcie,
> > > + MAP_REG(IPROC_PCIE_OARR0, idx), 0);
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (pcie->need_ib_cfg) {
> > > + /* iterate through all IARR mapping regions */
> > > + for (idx = 0; idx < ib->nr_regions; idx++) {
> > > + iproc_pcie_write_reg(pcie,
> > > + MAP_REG(IPROC_PCIE_IARR0, idx), 0);
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int iproce_pcie_get_msi(struct iproc_pcie *pcie,
> > > struct device_node *msi_node,
> > > u64 *msi_addr)
> > > @@ -1517,6 +1543,8 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res)
> > > iproc_pcie_perst_ctrl(pcie, true);
> > > iproc_pcie_perst_ctrl(pcie, false);
> > >
> > > + iproc_pcie_invalidate_mapping(pcie);
> > > +
> > > if (pcie->need_ob_cfg) {
> > > ret = iproc_pcie_map_ranges(pcie, res);
> > > if (ret) {
> >
> > The code changes look good to me.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andrew Murray
> >
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-06 12:01    [W:0.057 / U:12.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site