lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 4/5] ARM: dts: omap3-n950-n9: remove opp-v1 table
On 03-09-19, 08:01, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>
> > Am 03.09.2019 um 04:36 schrieb Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>:
> >
> > On 02-09-19, 12:55, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> >> With opp-v2 in omap36xx.dtsi and ti-cpufreq driver the
> >> 1GHz capability is automatically detected.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950-n9.dtsi | 7 -------
> >> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950-n9.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950-n9.dtsi
> >> index 5441e9ffdbb4..e98b0c615f19 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950-n9.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950-n9.dtsi
> >> @@ -11,13 +11,6 @@
> >> cpus {
> >> cpu@0 {
> >> cpu0-supply = <&vcc>;
> >> - operating-points = <
> >> - /* kHz uV */
> >> - 300000 1012500
> >> - 600000 1200000
> >> - 800000 1325000
> >> - 1000000 1375000
> >> - >;
> >> };
> >> };
> >
> > This should be merged with 2/5 ?
>
> Well, it bloats 2/5.

It is logically the right place to do this as that's where we are
adding opp-v2.

> What I hope (I can't test) is that this opp-v1 table
> is ignored if an opp-v2 table exists. So that it can be
> removed by a separate follow-up patch.

It should work as that's what we are doing in OPP core, but I still
feel this better get merged with 2/5.

--
viresh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-03 08:14    [W:0.051 / U:3.808 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site