lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: intel-sdxc-phy: Add YAML schema for LGM SDXC PHY
From
Date
Hi Rob,

  Thank you so much for the conclusion.

On 4/9/2019 5:34 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:52 AM Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Thank you for your suggestions and clarifications.
>>
>> On 3/9/2019 6:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:08 AM Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
>>> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you so much for prompt reply.
>>>>
>>>> On 3/9/2019 5:19 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:57 AM Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
>>>>> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for review comments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/9/2019 9:38 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 08:43:14PM +0800, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
>>>>>>>> From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Add a YAML schema to use the host controller driver with the
>>>>>>>> SDXC PHY on Intel's Lightning Mountain SoC.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> .../bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,syscon.yaml | 33 ++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml
>>>>>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,syscon.yaml
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml
>>>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>>>> index 000000000000..99647207b414
>>>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml
>>>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
>>>>>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>>>>>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>>>>>>> +---
>>>>>>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml#
>>>>>>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +title: Intel Lightning Mountain(LGM) SDXC PHY Device Tree Bindings
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +maintainers:
>>>>>>>> + - Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +allOf:
>>>>>>>> + - $ref: "intel,syscon.yaml"
>>>>>>> You don't need this. It should be selected and applied by the compatible
>>>>>>> string matching.
>>>>>> Agreed, fix it in the next patch.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +description: Binding for SDXC PHY
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +properties:
>>>>>>>> + compatible:
>>>>>>>> + const: intel,lgm-sdxc-phy
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + intel,syscon:
>>>>>>>> + description: phandle to the sdxc through syscon
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + clocks:
>>>>>>>> + maxItems: 1
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + clock-names:
>>>>>>>> + maxItems: 1
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + "#phy-cells":
>>>>>>>> + const: 0
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +required:
>>>>>>>> + - "#phy-cells"
>>>>>>>> + - compatible
>>>>>>>> + - intel,syscon
>>>>>>>> + - clocks
>>>>>>>> + - clock-names
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +additionalProperties: false
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +examples:
>>>>>>>> + - |
>>>>>>>> + sdxc_phy: sdxc_phy {
>>>>>>>> + compatible = "intel,lgm-sdxc-phy";
>>>>>>>> + intel,syscon = <&sysconf>;
>>>>>>> Make this a child of the below node and then you don't need this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If there's a register address range associated with this, then add a reg
>>>>>>> property.
>>>>>> Thanks for comments, I have defined herewith example
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sysconf: chiptop@e0020000 {
>>>>>> compatible = "intel,syscon";
>>>>> Needs to be SoC specific value.
>>>> Agreed! it should be "intel, lgm-syscon"
>>>>>> reg = <0xe0020000 0x100>;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> emmc_phy: emmc_phy {
>>>>>> compatible = "intel,lgm-emmc-phy";
>>>>>> intel,syscon = <&sysconf>;
>>>>> This is redundant because you can just get the parent node.
>>>>>
>>>>> If there's a defined register range within the 'intel,syscon' block
>>>>> then define it here with 'reg'.
>>>> Agreed!, avoided redundant
>>>>
>>>> sysconf: chiptop@e0020000 {
>>>> compatible = "intel,lgm-syscon";
>>>> emmc_phy: emmc_phy {
>>>> compatible = "intel,lgm-emmc-phy";
>>>> reg = <0xe0020000 0x100>;
>>> This is the same addresses you had for the parent, so that doesn't
>>> seem right. The parent should have the entire range and then the child
>>> nodes only the addresses for their functions. However, if the
>>> registers are all interleaved then you can really put 'reg' in the
>>> child nodes and just have it only in the parent. We don't want to have
>>> overlapping addresses in DT.
>> syscon is parent node, which has the base address for all the peripheral
>> registers and used by child nodes.
>> child nodes have only offsets, we do not specify in device tree.
> Right, and I'm asking you to add the offsets whether Linux uses them or not.

Agreed!, will update the patch.

Best Regards
vadivel
> Rob

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-04 03:09    [W:0.051 / U:3.964 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site