lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] iwlwifi: dvm: excessive if in rs_bt_update_lq()
Date
There is no need to check 'priv->bt_ant_couple_ok' twice in
rs_bt_update_lq(). The second check is always true. Thus, the
expression can be simplified.

Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
index 74229fcb63a9..226165db7dfd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ static void rs_bt_update_lq(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_rxon_context *ctx,
* Is there a need to switch between
* full concurrency and 3-wire?
*/
- if (priv->bt_ci_compliance && priv->bt_ant_couple_ok)
+ if (priv->bt_ci_compliance)
full_concurrent = true;
else
full_concurrent = false;
--
2.21.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-25 22:50    [W:0.038 / U:1.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site