lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] mm: implement write-behind policy for sequential file writes
Hello,

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 06:06:46PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On 23/09/2019 17.52, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >Hello, Konstantin.
> >
> >On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 10:39:33AM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> >>With vm.dirty_write_behind 1 or 2 files are written even faster and
> >
> >Is the faster speed reproducible? I don't quite understand why this
> >would be.
>
> Writing to disk simply starts earlier.

I see.

> >Generic write-behind would definitely have other benefits and also a
> >bunch of regression possibilities. I'm not trying to say that
> >write-behind isn't a good idea but it'd be useful to consider that a
> >good portion of the benefits can already be obtained fairly easily.
> >
>
> I'm afraid this could end badly if each simple task like file copying
> will require own systemd job and container with manual tuning.

At least the write window size part of it is pretty easy - the range
of acceptable values is fiarly wide - and setting up a cgroup and
running a command in it isn't that expensive. It's not like these
need full-on containers. That said, yes, there sure are benefits to
the kernel being able to detect and handle these conditions
automagically.

Thanks.

--
tejun

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-23 17:20    [W:0.101 / U:4.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site