[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: threads-max observe limits
On Wed 18-09-19 09:15:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 17-09-19 12:26:18, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > b) Not being able to bump threads_max to the physical limit of
> > the machine is very clearly a regression.
> ... exactly this part. The changelog of the respective patch doesn't
> really exaplain why it is needed except of "it sounds like a good idea
> to be consistent".

Any take on this Heinrich? If there really is not strong reasoning about
the restricting user input then I will suggest reverting 16db3d3f1170
("kernel/sysctl.c: threads-max observe limits")

Michal Hocko

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-19 10:00    [W:0.128 / U:2.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site