lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Improve memset
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:22:37AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> In order to patch on machines which don't set X86_FEATURE_ERMS, I need
> to do a "reversed" patching of sorts, i.e., patch when the x86 feature
> flag is NOT set. See the below changes in alternative.c which basically
> add a flags field to struct alt_instr and thus control the patching
> behavior in apply_alternatives().
>
> The result is this:
>
> static __always_inline void *memset(void *dest, int c, size_t n)
> {
> void *ret, *dummy;
>
> asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_2_REVERSE("rep; stosb",
> "call memset_rep", X86_FEATURE_ERMS,
> "call memset_orig", X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD)
> : "=&D" (ret), "=a" (dummy)
> : "0" (dest), "a" (c), "c" (n)
> /* clobbers used by memset_orig() and memset_rep_good() */
> : "rsi", "rdx", "r8", "r9", "memory");
>
> return dest;
> }

I think this also needs ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT.

Doesn't this break on older non-ERMS CPUs when the memset() is done
early, before alternative patching?

Could it instead do this?

ALTERNATIVE_2("call memset_orig",
"call memset_rep", X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD,
"rep; stosb", X86_FEATURE_ERMS)

Then the "reverse alternatives" feature wouldn't be needed anyway.

--
Josh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-17 22:11    [W:0.130 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site