lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] media: v4l: cadence: Fix how unsued lanes are handled in 'csi2rx_start()'
From
Date
Le 16/09/2019 à 08:28, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:57:09AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Hi Christophe,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:44:50PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>> The 2nd parameter of 'find_first_zero_bit()' is a number of bits, not of
>>> bytes. So use 'BITS_PER_LONG' instead of 'sizeof(lanes_used)'.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 1fc3b37f34f6 ("media: v4l: cadence: Add Cadence MIPI-CSI2 RX driver")
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
>>> ---
>>> This patch is purely speculative. Using BITS_PER_LONG looks logical to me,
>>> but I'm not 100% sure that it is what is expected here. 'csi2rx->max_lanes'
>>> could also be a good candidate.
>> Yeah, csi2rx->max_lanes would make more sense in that context. Could
>> you resend a new version?
> This is sort of unrelated, but for Smatch purposes the csi2rx->max_lanes
> comes from the firmware in csi2rx_parse_dt() and it could be any u8
> value.

Hi Dan,

not sure to follow you.

csi2rx_probe()
  --> csi2rx_get_resources()
     -->  ...
          dev_cfg = readl(csi2rx->base + CSI2RX_DEVICE_CFG_REG);
          ...
          csi2rx->max_lanes = dev_cfg & 7;
          if (csi2rx->max_lanes > CSI2RX_LANES_MAX) {
             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid number of lanes: %u\n",
                     csi2rx->max_lanes);
             return -EINVAL;
          }

So I guess, that we can trust max_lanes because of the 'if (... >
CSI2RX_LANES_MAX)' check.

Did I miss something?


> I sort of wish that people would write code which was known to be
> correct just from reading the kernel code, without looking at the
> firmware... I guess I could mark v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse() as always
> giving us valid data, but that still wouldn't tell us what the valid
> data is. It's hard to know the right answer from a static analysis
> point of view.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-16 21:25    [W:0.090 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site