lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 15/15] drivers: thermal: tsens: Add interrupt support
Hi Thara,

Thanks for the review. Please find replies below.

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:23 AM Thara Gopinath
<thara.gopinath@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> On 08/27/2019 08:14 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > Depending on the IP version, TSENS supports upper, lower, max, min and
> > critical threshold interrupts. We only add support for upper and lower
> > threshold interrupts for now.
> >
> > TSENSv2 has an irq [status|clear|mask] bit tuple for each sensor while
> > earlier versions only have a single bit per sensor to denote status and
> > clear. At each interrupt, we reprogram the new upper and lower threshold
> > in the .set_trip callback.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c | 377 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v0_1.c | 11 +
> > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c | 29 +++
> > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c | 13 +
> > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 32 ++-
> > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h | 270 ++++++++++++++++----
> > 6 files changed, 669 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > index 06b44cfd5eab9..c549f8e1488ba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c

<snip>

Please snip liberally when only replying to a small part of the patch. :-)

> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->ul_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + if (trigger) {
> > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: TZ update trigger (%d mC)\n",
> > + hw_id, __func__, temp);
> > + thermal_zone_device_update(priv->sensor[i].tzd,
> > + THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED);
> Why not use thermal_notify_framework? Or do you want to loop over all
> registered trips ?

Mainly so we get a driver call-back to set_trips where we might want
to change behaviour once we cross certain thresholds.

> Another comment I have is regarding support for multiple thermal zone.
> It might not be needed now, but presence of the same sensor can serve
> multiple zones (one for cooling and one for warming) . I am not sure if
> you want to put some infrastructure in place for that as well for
> interrupt handling.

It is premature to add such infrastructure to the driver until we
decide how we're going to implement support for this, IMO.

<snip>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-10 18:02    [W:0.120 / U:33.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site