[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 09/11] Input: alps - remove unlikely() from IS_ERR*() condition
On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 17:25 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 29 August 2019 10:50:39 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 07:50:23PM +0300, Denis Efremov wrote:
> > > "unlikely(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(x))" is excessive. IS_ERR_OR_NULL() already uses
> > > unlikely() internally.
> >
> > The keyword here is _internally_.
> >
> >
> >
> > So please no.

I think it poor form not to simply restate your original
objection from 4 message levels below this link

Hm... I do not like this change. If I read code

if (unlikely(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->dev3)))

then I know that it is really unlikely that condition will be truth and
so this is some case of error/exception or something that normally does
not happen too much.

But if I read code

if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->dev3))

I know nothing about chance that this condition will be truth. Explicit
unlikely in previous example give me more information.

I alslo think this argument is dubious as it also applies
to any IS_ERR and all the unlikely uses have been removed
from those.

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-31 22:32    [W:0.090 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site