lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V40 03/29] security: Add a static lockdown policy LSM
Date
Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett@google.com> wrote:

> +static char *lockdown_reasons[LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX+1] = {

const char *const maybe?

> +static enum lockdown_reason lockdown_levels[] = {LOCKDOWN_NONE,
> + LOCKDOWN_INTEGRITY_MAX,
> + LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX};
> +

const?

Isn't this also a 1:1 mapping?

> +static int lock_kernel_down(const char *where, enum lockdown_reason level)

Is the last parameter the reason or the level? You're mixing the terms.

David

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-30 18:28    [W:0.243 / U:17.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site