lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Lay common foundation to make PVR/SGX work without hacks on OMAP34xx, OMAP36xx, AM335x and potentially OMAP4, OMAP5
* Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> [190819 19:26]:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 2:03 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> >
> > * Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> [190816 23:02]:
> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 8:16 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > > > Well I just posted some sgx interconnect target module patches. We might
> > > > still have them in v5.4 assuming people manage to review and test them.
> > >
> > > Nikolaus,
> > >
> > > I tested Tony's change and I can confirm that I can read the value
> > > when enabled. Should I apply his patches to your branch before I
> > > test, or is it go too to go as-is? I've got an AM3517, OMAP35 and a
> > > DM3730. I am not sure if the AM3517 is even on the radar, but it has
> > > an sgx530 as well.
> >
> > My estimate is am3517 is wired the same way as omap34xx with a 60%
> > chance, then 30% chance it's wired the same way as omap36xx, and then
> > 10% chance for similar wiring to am335x.. So hopefully that leaves 0%
> > chance for yet something different for it's wiring :)
>
> Based on [1], I went under the assumption it was wired like the
> omap34xx. I applied your omap34 patches to the am3517.dtsi, and I was
> able to get the same response as I did for the omap3530. Do you want
> me to post the patches to the mailing list, or do you want to do it?

OK great, yeah please post patches :)

Thanks,

TOny

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-21 13:39    [W:0.063 / U:3.900 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site