lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ARM64: dts: allwinner: Add devicetree for pine H64 modelA evaluation board
From
Date
在 2019-08-20二的 15:58 +0200,Maxime Ripard写道:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 04:00:16PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 03:52:06PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:57:50PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:36:50PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:35:13AM +0200, Corentin Labbe
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 03:33:22PM +0200, Maxime Ripard
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 03:17:41PM +0200, Corentin Labbe
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:40:00AM +0200, Maxime Ripard
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:42:53AM +0200, Corentin
> > > > > > > > > Labbe wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > This patch adds the evaluation variant of the model
> > > > > > > > > > A of the PineH64.
> > > > > > > > > > The model A has the same size of the pine64 and has
> > > > > > > > > > a PCIE slot.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The only devicetree difference with current
> > > > > > > > > > pineH64, is the PHY
> > > > > > > > > > regulator.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <
> > > > > > > > > > clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile | 1
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > .../sun50i-h6-pine-h64-modelA-eval.dts | 26
> > > > > > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > > > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
> > > > > > > > > > create mode 100644
> > > > > > > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-pine-h64-
> > > > > > > > > > modelA-eval.dts
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile
> > > > > > > > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile
> > > > > > > > > > index f6db0611cb85..9a02166cbf72 100644
> > > > > > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile
> > > > > > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -25,3 +25,4 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) +=
> > > > > > > > > > sun50i-h6-orangepi-3.dtb
> > > > > > > > > > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h6-orangepi-
> > > > > > > > > > lite2.dtb
> > > > > > > > > > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h6-orangepi-
> > > > > > > > > > one-plus.dtb
> > > > > > > > > > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h6-pine-h64.dtb
> > > > > > > > > > +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h6-pine-h64-
> > > > > > > > > > modelA-eval.dtb
> > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-
> > > > > > > > > > h6-pine-h64-modelA-eval.dts
> > > > > > > > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-pine-h64-
> > > > > > > > > > modelA-eval.dts
> > > > > > > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > > > > > > index 000000000000..d8ff02747efe
> > > > > > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-pine-
> > > > > > > > > > h64-modelA-eval.dts
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> > > > > > > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ or MIT)
> > > > > > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > > > > > + * Copyright (C) 2019 Corentin Labbe <
> > > > > > > > > > clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > +#include "sun50i-h6-pine-h64.dts"
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > +/ {
> > > > > > > > > > + model = "Pine H64 model A evaluation board";
> > > > > > > > > > + compatible = "pine64,pine-h64-modelA-eval",
> > > > > > > > > > "allwinner,sun50i-h6";
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > + reg_gmac_3v3: gmac-3v3 {
> > > > > > > > > > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > > > > > > > > > + regulator-name = "vcc-gmac-3v3";
> > > > > > > > > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > > > > > > > > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > > > > > > > > > + startup-delay-us = <100000>;
> > > > > > > > > > + gpio = <&pio 2 16 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > > > > > > > > > + enable-active-high;
> > > > > > > > > > + };
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > +&emac {
> > > > > > > > > > + phy-supply = <&reg_gmac_3v3>;
> > > > > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I might be missing some context here, but I'm pretty
> > > > > > > > > sure that the
> > > > > > > > > initial intent of the pine h64 DTS was to support the
> > > > > > > > > model A all
> > > > > > > > > along.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The regulator changed between modelA and B.
> > > > > > > > See this old patchset (supporting modelA)
> > > > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10539149/ for
> > > > > > > > example.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm not sure what your point is, but mine is that
> > > > > > > everything about the
> > > > > > > model A should be in sun50i-h6-pine-h64.dts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > model A and B are different enough for distinct dtb, (see
> > > > > > sub-thread
> > > > > > on HDMI difference for an other difference than PHY
> > > > > > regulator)
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't mind having separate DTBs for model A and model B.
> > > > >
> > > > > > And clearly, the current dtb is for model B.
> > > > >
> > > > > That DTS was added almost a year before the model B was
> > > > > announced, and
> > > > > no commit to that file mention the model B, so it's
> > > > > definitely not
> > > > > clear.
> > > >
> > > > Normal it was added for model A (without any ethernet/HDMI
> > > > support,
> > > > so nothing distinct from model B), and the modelB ethernet/HDMI
> > > > support cames after.
> > >
> > > Changing the board a DT is meant to halfway through the
> > > development is
> > > definitely not ok.
> > >
> > > > > > So do you mean that we need to create a new dtb for model B
> > > > > > ? (and
> > > > > > hack the current back to model A ?)
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd prefer not to hack anything, but yes
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Since model A is not public (only evaluations boards exists),
> > > > the
> > > > probability of a production model A is low and the current dtb
> > > > is
> > > > perfect for model B , could you reconsider this ?
> > >
> > > I mean, you could buy it, so it's definitely public.
> >
> > Where ? official pineh64 site speaks only of modelB.
>
> It's not available anymore, but it used to be.

There're never model A boards that are really sold. When model A is put
on the website, its stock is always 0.

Only model B boards are really sold.

BTW from my communication with TL Lim, model A will get redesigned to
get the software compatiblity with model B, if it's going to be re-
available on the market again. So all known difference will be not
difference between models, but difference between sample version and
final version. But even if the new model A is out, it will still need a
different devicetree with model B, as PCIe is model-A-only feature, and
model A will have no on-board Wi-Fi (model B has RTL8723BS on-board).

>
> > > Model A also had HDMI, and it doesn't look like there's anything
> > > particularly specific with that board.
> >
> > A subthread just say the opposite, modelA need something more for
> > HDMI
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/12/394
>
> Right, but that's not in the DT at the moment.
>
> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-21 11:20    [W:0.066 / U:3.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site