lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] sched/fair: Add missing unthrottle_cfs_rq()
Date
Turns out a cfs_rq->runtime_remaining can become positive in
assign_cfs_rq_runtime(), but this codepath has no call to
unthrottle_cfs_rq().

This can leave us in a situation where we have a throttled cfs_rq with
positive ->runtime_remaining, which breaks the math in
distribute_cfs_runtime(): this function expects a negative value so that
it may safely negate it into a positive value.

Add the missing unthrottle_cfs_rq(). While at it, add a WARN_ON where
we expect negative values, and pull in a comment from the mailing list
that didn't make it in [1].

[1]: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/BANLkTi=NmCxKX6EbDQcJYDJ5kKyG2N1ssw@mail.gmail.com

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: ec12cb7f31e2 ("sched: Accumulate per-cfs_rq cpu usage and charge against bandwidth")
Reported-by: Liangyan <liangyan.peng@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 1054d2cf6aaa..219ff3f328e5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4385,6 +4385,11 @@ static inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_task(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
return rq_clock_task(rq_of(cfs_rq)) - cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task_time;
}

+static inline int cfs_rq_throttled(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+ return cfs_bandwidth_used() && cfs_rq->throttled;
+}
+
/* returns 0 on failure to allocate runtime */
static int assign_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
@@ -4411,6 +4416,9 @@ static int assign_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)

cfs_rq->runtime_remaining += amount;

+ if (cfs_rq->runtime_remaining > 0 && cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
+ unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
+
return cfs_rq->runtime_remaining > 0;
}

@@ -4439,11 +4447,6 @@ void account_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, u64 delta_exec)
__account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, delta_exec);
}

-static inline int cfs_rq_throttled(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
-{
- return cfs_bandwidth_used() && cfs_rq->throttled;
-}
-
/* check whether cfs_rq, or any parent, is throttled */
static inline int throttled_hierarchy(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
@@ -4628,6 +4631,10 @@ static u64 distribute_cfs_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, u64 remaining)
if (!cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
goto next;

+ /* By the above check, this should never be true */
+ WARN_ON(cfs_rq->runtime_remaining > 0);
+
+ /* Pick the minimum amount to return to a positive quota state */
runtime = -cfs_rq->runtime_remaining + 1;
if (runtime > remaining)
runtime = remaining;
--
2.22.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-20 12:55    [W:0.148 / U:2.880 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site