lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] nfc: st-nci: Fix an incorrect skb_buff size in 'st_nci_i2c_read()'
From
Date
Le 12/08/2019 à 05:57, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 16:16:40 +0200
>
>> In 'st_nci_i2c_read()', we allocate a sk_buff with a size of
>> ST_NCI_I2C_MIN_SIZE + len.
>>
>> However, later on, we first 'skb_reserve()' ST_NCI_I2C_MIN_SIZE bytes, then
>> we 'skb_put()' ST_NCI_I2C_MIN_SIZE bytes.
>> Finally, if 'len' is not 0, we 'skb_put()' 'len' bytes.
>>
>> So we use ST_NCI_I2C_MIN_SIZE*2 + len bytes.
>>
>> This is incorrect and should already panic. I guess that it does not occur
>> because of extra memory allocated because of some rounding.
>>
>> Fix it and allocate enough room for the 'skb_reserve()' and the 'skb_put()'
>> calls.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
>> ---
>> This patch is LIKELY INCORRECT. So think twice to what is the correct
>> solution before applying it.
>> Maybe the skb_reserve should be axed or some other sizes are incorrect.
>> There seems to be an issue, that's all I can say.
> The skb_reserve() should be removed,

I don't fully understand the potential implications, but looks ok to me.
At least, the allocated memory and the size of the used memory would match.

What I don't understand is why is does not BUG_ON with the current code.
Does my suspected "over allocation" because of rounding/aligment could
hide the issue?

A Tested-by: by someone who has the corresponding hardware would also be
useful IMHO.

> and the second memcpy() should remove
> the " + ST_NCI_I2C_MIN_SIZE".
Hmm, not sure on this one.

The skb is manipulated only with skb_put. So only the tail pointer and
len are updated. The data pointer remains at the same position, so there
should effectively be an offset of ST_NCI_I2C_MIN_SIZE for the 2nd memcpy.

Maybe, using skb_put_data would be cleaner here, in order to
"concatenate" these 2 parts without having to handle by hand the right
position in the buffer.

If you agree, I'll send a V2.


Thx for the review and comments.

CJ

> This SKB just get sent down to ndlc_recv() so the content returned from I2C
> should places at skb->data to be processed.
>
> Pretty clear this code was never tested.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-20 07:34    [W:0.070 / U:4.560 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site