[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Jul 31 - s390 crypto build breakage
On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 06:14, Herbert Xu <> wrote:
> Hi Stephen:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 10:20:19AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > It might be time to revert all this series and try again. The
> > implementation seems to have not been well thought through from a kernel
> > building point of view. For a start the two commits
> >
> > 7cdc0ddbf74a ("crypto: aegis128 - add support for SIMD acceleration")
> > ecc8bc81f2fb ("crypto: aegis128 - provide a SIMD implementation based on NEON intrinsics")
> I think the idea was that it would get optimised out if the
> implementation is absent which is why it was meant to work in
> this order. But oviously as we have found out this didn't work.
> Ard, I think relying on the compiler to optimise something out based
> on an assignment within an if statement is just too error-prone.
> We'll need a different mechanism for this.

Indeed. This is definitely something I tested, and it appears to be
dependent on the GCC version.

> For now I'm going to back out those two specific patches as the
> rest seem to be valid by themselves.

OK. I will adopt this mechanism [0] after all and resubmit, once I get
confirmation from either Voldis or Heiko that this makes the issue go
away (given that my local GCC does not reproduce the issue)


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-02 08:46    [W:0.149 / U:2.904 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site