lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add second level of context descriptor table
From
Date
Hi Jean,

On 6/10/19 8:47 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> The SMMU can support up to 20 bits of SSID. Add a second level of page
> tables to accommodate this. Devices that support more than 1024 SSIDs now
> have a table of 1024 L1 entries (8kB), pointing to tables of 1024 context
> descriptors (64kB), allocated on demand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index d90eb604b65d..326b71793336 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -216,6 +216,8 @@
>
> #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT GENMASK_ULL(5, 4)
> #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR 0
> +#define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_4K_L2 1
As you only use 64kB L2, I guess you can remove the 4K define?
> +#define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_64K_L2 2
> #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK GENMASK_ULL(51, 6)
> #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX GENMASK_ULL(63, 59)
>
> @@ -255,6 +257,18 @@
>
> #define STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK GENMASK_ULL(51, 4)
>
> +/*
> + * Linear: when less than 1024 SSIDs are supported
> + * 2lvl: at most 1024 L1 entrie,
entries
> + * 1024 lazy entries per table.
> + */
> +#define CTXDESC_SPLIT 10
> +#define CTXDESC_NUM_L2_ENTRIES (1 << CTXDESC_SPLIT)
> +
> +#define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORD 1
> +#define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_VALID 1
> +#define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK GENMASK_ULL(51, 12)
> +
> /* Context descriptor (stage-1 only) */
> #define CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS 8
> #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_T0SZ GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
> @@ -530,7 +544,10 @@ struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc {
> struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg {
> u8 s1fmt;
> u8 s1cdmax;
> - struct arm_smmu_cd_table table;
> + struct arm_smmu_cd_table *tables;
> + size_t num_tables;
> + __le64 *l1ptr;
> + dma_addr_t l1ptr_dma;
>
> /* Context descriptor 0, when substreams are disabled or s1dss = 0b10 */
> struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc cd;
> @@ -1118,12 +1135,51 @@ static void arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> {
> size_t size = num_entries * (CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS << 3);
>
> + if (!table->ptr)
> + return;
> dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, table->ptr, table->ptr_dma);
> }
>
> -static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg, u32 ssid)
> +static void arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(__le64 *dst,
> + struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table)
> {
> - return cfg->table.ptr + ssid * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> + u64 val = (table->ptr_dma & CTXDESC_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK) |
> + CTXDESC_L1_DESC_VALID;
> +
> + *dst = cpu_to_le64(val);
> +}
> +
> +static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> + u32 ssid)> +{
> + unsigned int idx;
> + struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table;
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> + struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
> +
> + if (cfg->s1fmt == STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR) {
> + table = &cfg->tables[0];
> + idx = ssid;
> + } else {
> + idx = ssid >> CTXDESC_SPLIT;
> + if (idx >= cfg->num_tables)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + table = &cfg->tables[idx];
> + if (!table->ptr) {
> + __le64 *l1ptr = cfg->l1ptr + idx * CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORD;
> +
> + if (arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, table,
> + CTXDESC_NUM_L2_ENTRIES))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(l1ptr, table);
> + /* An invalid L1 entry is allowed to be cached */
> + arm_smmu_sync_cd(smmu_domain, ssid, false);
> + }
> + idx = ssid & (CTXDESC_NUM_L2_ENTRIES - 1);
> + }
> + return table->ptr + idx * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> }
>
> static u64 arm_smmu_cpu_tcr_to_cd(u64 tcr)
> @@ -1149,7 +1205,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> u64 val;
> bool cd_live;
> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> - __le64 *cdptr = arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(&smmu_domain->s1_cfg, ssid);
> + __le64 *cdptr = arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(smmu_domain, ssid);
>
> /*
> * This function handles the following cases:
> @@ -1213,20 +1269,81 @@ static int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> static int arm_smmu_alloc_cd_tables(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> struct arm_smmu_master *master)
> {
> + int ret;
> + size_t size = 0;
> + size_t max_contexts, num_leaf_entries;
> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
>
> cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR;
> cfg->s1cdmax = master->ssid_bits;
> - return arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->table, 1 << cfg->s1cdmax);
> +
> + max_contexts = 1 << cfg->s1cdmax;
> + if (!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_CDTAB) ||
> + max_contexts <= CTXDESC_NUM_L2_ENTRIES) {
> + cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR;
> + cfg->num_tables = 1;
> + num_leaf_entries = max_contexts;
> + } else {
> + cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_64K_L2;
> + /*
> + * SSID[S1CDmax-1:10] indexes 1st-level table, SSID[9:0] indexes
> + * 2nd-level
> + */
> + cfg->num_tables = max_contexts / CTXDESC_NUM_L2_ENTRIES;
> +
> + size = cfg->num_tables * (CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORD << 3);
> + cfg->l1ptr = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, size,
> + &cfg->l1ptr_dma,
> + GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> + if (!cfg->l1ptr) {
> + dev_warn(smmu->dev, "failed to allocate L1 context table\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + num_leaf_entries = CTXDESC_NUM_L2_ENTRIES;
> + }
> +
> + cfg->tables = devm_kzalloc(smmu->dev, sizeof(struct arm_smmu_cd_table) *
> + cfg->num_tables, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cfg->tables)
> + return -ENOMEM;
goto err_free_l1
> +
> + ret = arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->tables[0], num_leaf_entries);
don't you want to do that only in linear case. In 2-level mode, I
understand arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr() will do the job.

> + if (ret)
> + goto err_free_l1;
> +
> + if (cfg->l1ptr)
> + arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(cfg->l1ptr, &cfg->tables[0]);
that stuff could be removed as well? By the way I can see that
arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr() does a arm_smmu_sync_cd after. wouldn't it be
needed here as well?
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_free_l1:
> + if (cfg->l1ptr)
> + dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, cfg->l1ptr, cfg->l1ptr_dma);
> + devm_kfree(smmu->dev, cfg->tables);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void arm_smmu_free_cd_tables(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain)
> {
> + int i;
> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
> + size_t num_leaf_entries = 1 << cfg->s1cdmax;
> + struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table = cfg->tables;
> +
> + if (cfg->l1ptr) {
> + size_t size = cfg->num_tables * (CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORD << 3);
>
> - arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->table, 1 << cfg->s1cdmax);
> + dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, cfg->l1ptr,
> + cfg->l1ptr_dma);
> + num_leaf_entries = CTXDESC_NUM_L2_ENTRIES;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_tables; i++, table++)
> + arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(smmu, table, num_leaf_entries);
> + devm_kfree(smmu->dev, cfg->tables);
> }
>
> /* Stream table manipulation functions */
> @@ -1346,6 +1463,9 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
> }
>
> if (s1_cfg) {
> + dma_addr_t ptr_dma = s1_cfg->l1ptr ? s1_cfg->l1ptr_dma :
> + s1_cfg->tables[0].ptr_dma;
> +
> BUG_ON(ste_live);
> dst[1] = cpu_to_le64(
> FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0) |
> @@ -1358,7 +1478,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
> !(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALL_FORCE))
> dst[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD);
>
> - val |= (s1_cfg->table.ptr_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
> + val |= (ptr_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
> FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS) |
> FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX, s1_cfg->s1cdmax) |
> FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT, s1_cfg->s1fmt);
> @@ -1815,7 +1935,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1) {
> struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
>
> - if (cfg->table.ptr) {
> + if (cfg->tables) {
> arm_smmu_free_cd_tables(smmu_domain);
> arm_smmu_bitmap_free(smmu->asid_map, cfg->cd.asid);
I don't get why the arm_smmu_bitmap_free is dependent on cfg->tables.

Thanks

Eric
> }
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-08 17:13    [W:0.197 / U:5.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site