[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/2] char: tpm: add new driver for tpm i2c ptp
On 04.07.2019 10:43, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Check out tpm_tis_core.c and tpm_tis_spi.c. TPM TIS driver implements
> that spec so you should only implement a new physical layer.

I had the same thought. Unfortunately, the I2C-TIS specification
introduces two relevant changes compared to tpm_tis/tpm_tis_spi:

1. Locality is not encoded into register addresses anymore, but stored
in a separate register.
2. Several register addresses have changed (but still contain compatible

I'd still prefer not to duplicate all the high-level logic from
tpm_tis_core. But this will probably mean to introduce some new
interfaces between tpm_tis_core and the physical layers.

Also, shouldn't the new driver be called tpm_tis_i2c, to group it with
all the other (TIS) drivers, that implement a vendor-independent
protocol? With tpm_i2c_ptp users might assume that ptp is just another


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-04 13:38    [W:0.191 / U:0.516 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site