lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: stmmac: Introducing support for Page Pool
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:13:37AM +0000, Jose Abreu wrote:
> From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
>
> > The page_pool DMA mapping cannot be "kept" when page traveling into the
> > network stack attached to an SKB. (Ilias and I have a long term plan[1]
> > to allow this, but you cannot do it ATM).
>
> The reason I recycle the page is this previous call to:
>
> skb_copy_to_linear_data()
>
> So, technically, I'm syncing to CPU the page(s) and then memcpy to a
> previously allocated SKB ... So it's safe to just recycle the mapping I
> think.
>
> Its kind of using bounce buffers and I do see performance gain in this
> (I think the reason is because my setup uses swiotlb for DMA mapping).

Maybe. Have you tested this on big/small packets?
Can you do a test with 64b/128b and 1024b for example?
The memcpy might be cheap for the small sized packets (and cheaper than the dma
map/unmap)

>
> Anyway, I'm open to some suggestions on how to improve this ...
>
> > Also remember that the page_pool requires you driver to do the DMA-sync
> > operation. I see a dma_sync_single_for_cpu(), but I didn't see a
> > dma_sync_single_for_device() (well, I noticed one getting removed).
> > (For some HW Ilias tells me that the dma_sync_single_for_device can be
> > elided, so maybe this can still be correct for you).
>
> My HW just needs descriptors refilled which are in different coherent
> region so I don't see any reason for dma_sync_single_for_device() ...
I am abit overloaded at the moment. I'll try to have a look at this and get back
to you

Cheers
/Ilias

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-04 13:11    [W:0.103 / U:3.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site