lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4 v4] irqchip: Ingenic: Add support for new Ingenic Socs.
From
Date
Hi Paul,
It seems very strange to appear another soc model in one soc's devicetree,
and before submitting this patch I referred to some other irq drivers.
Similar
usage was found in irq-sunxi-nmi.c and irq-omap-intc.c, and the original
irq-ingenic.c was declare jz4770, jz4775, jz4780 in the same way. So I
followed
the same method to add the declare of jz4760/x1000/x1500, this may be a
little
better.

On 2019年07月30日 01:25, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>
>
> Le dim. 28 juil. 2019 à 13:34, Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@zoho.com> a
> écrit :
>> Add support for probing the irq-ingenic driver on the JZ4760/JZ4760B
>> and the X1000/X1000E and the X1500 Socs from Ingenic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@zoho.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c
>> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c
>> index 8430f5a..b72430c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c
>> @@ -173,6 +173,11 @@ static int __init intc_2chip_of_init(struct
>> device_node *node,
>> {
>> return ingenic_intc_of_init(node, 2);
>> }
>> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(jz4760_intc, "ingenic,jz4760-intc",
>> intc_2chip_of_init);
>> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(jz4760b_intc, "ingenic,jz4760b-intc",
>> intc_2chip_of_init);
>> IRQCHIP_DECLARE(jz4770_intc, "ingenic,jz4770-intc",
>> intc_2chip_of_init);
>> IRQCHIP_DECLARE(jz4775_intc, "ingenic,jz4775-intc",
>> intc_2chip_of_init);
>> IRQCHIP_DECLARE(jz4780_intc, "ingenic,jz4780-intc",
>> intc_2chip_of_init);
>> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(x1000_intc, "ingenic,x1000-intc", intc_2chip_of_init);
>> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(x1000e_intc, "ingenic,x1000e-intc",
>> intc_2chip_of_init);
>> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(x1500_intc, "ingenic,x1500-intc", intc_2chip_of_init);
>
> All these compatible strings point to the exact same behaviour. It was
> already a mistake to have the three "ingenic,jz47[70,75,80]-intc" here;
> there should have been only one, e.g. "ingenic,jz4770-intc" and the other
> two SoCs using it as a fallback compatible.
>
> I think you don't need to add these, and in your devicetree just use
> "ingenic,jz4780-intc" as a fallback compatible.
>
> Cheers,
> -Paul
>
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-30 11:27    [W:0.071 / U:7.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site