[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: opp: Introduce opp-peak-KBps and opp-avg-KBps bindings
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:58:08AM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:25 AM Sibi Sankar <> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Saravana,
> >
> >
> > There was already a discussion ^^ on how bandwidth bindings were to be
> > named.
> Yes, I'm aware of that series. That series is trying to define a BW
> mapping for an existing frequency OPP table. This patch is NOT about
> adding a mapping to an existing table. This patch is about adding the
> notion of BW OPP tables where BW is the "key" instead of "frequency".
> So let's not mixed up these two series.

Maybe different reasons, but in the end we'd end up with 2 bandwidth
properties. We need to sort out how they'd overlap/coexist.

The same comment in that series about defining a standard unit suffix
also applies to this one.


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-23 01:36    [W:0.087 / U:7.752 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site