lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/22] x86/kvm: Fix frame pointer usage in vmx_vmenter()
From
Date
On 15/07/19 14:37, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 11:04:03AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 15/07/19 02:36, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>>> With CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER, vmx_vmenter() needs to do frame pointer setup
>>> before calling kvm_spurious_fault().
>>>
>>> Fixes the following warning:
>>>
>>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.o: warning: objtool: vmx_vmenter()+0x14: call without frame pointer save/setup
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
>>
>> This is not enough, because the RSP value must match what is computed at
>> this place:
>>
>> /* Adjust RSP to account for the CALL to vmx_vmenter(). */
>> lea -WORD_SIZE(%_ASM_SP), %_ASM_ARG2
>> call vmx_update_host_rsp
>
> Ah, that is surprising :-)
>
> And then there's this, which overwrites the frame pointer anyway:
>
> mov VCPU_RBP(%_ASM_AX), %_ASM_BP
>
> Would it make sense to remove the call to vmx_vmenter() altogether, and
> just either embed it in __vmx_vcpu_run(), or jmp back and forth to it
> from __vmx_vcpu_run()?

Unfortunately there's another use of it in nested_vmx_check_vmentry_hw.

The problem is that storing RSP (no matter if adjusted or not) needs a
scratch register. And vmx_vmenter is exactly the part of the vmentry
that doesn't have any scratch registers available.

Therefore, you must arrange for the caller to store RSP. You cannot for
example remove it from __vmx_vcpu_run and nested_vmx_check_vmentry_hw in
favor of vmx_vmenter. :(

>> Is this important since kvm_spurious_fault is just BUG()?
>
> It's probably only important if you care about the stack trace for the
> BUG() case. But BP is clobbered anyway so I guess it doesn't matter.

Yes, BP is the guest RBP at this point of the code.

Paolo

>> There is no macro currently to support CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE in
>> assembly code, but it's also fine if you just change the call to ud2.
>
> That would be one way to make objtool happy.
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-15 15:04    [W:0.230 / U:1.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site