lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 1/3] sched/fair: Move init_numa_balancing() below task_numa_work()
Date
To reference task_numa_work() from within init_numa_balancing(), we
need the former to be declared before the latter. Do just that.

This is a pure code movement.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 036be95a87e9..476b0201a8fb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1169,47 +1169,6 @@ static unsigned int task_scan_max(struct task_struct *p)
return max(smin, smax);
}

-void init_numa_balancing(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
-{
- int mm_users = 0;
- struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
-
- if (mm) {
- mm_users = atomic_read(&mm->mm_users);
- if (mm_users == 1) {
- mm->numa_next_scan = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay);
- mm->numa_scan_seq = 0;
- }
- }
- p->node_stamp = 0;
- p->numa_scan_seq = mm ? mm->numa_scan_seq : 0;
- p->numa_scan_period = sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay;
- p->numa_work.next = &p->numa_work;
- p->numa_faults = NULL;
- p->numa_group = NULL;
- p->last_task_numa_placement = 0;
- p->last_sum_exec_runtime = 0;
-
- /* New address space, reset the preferred nid */
- if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_VM)) {
- p->numa_preferred_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
- return;
- }
-
- /*
- * New thread, keep existing numa_preferred_nid which should be copied
- * already by arch_dup_task_struct but stagger when scans start.
- */
- if (mm) {
- unsigned int delay;
-
- delay = min_t(unsigned int, task_scan_max(current),
- current->numa_scan_period * mm_users * NSEC_PER_MSEC);
- delay += 2 * TICK_NSEC;
- p->node_stamp = delay;
- }
-}
-
static void account_numa_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
rq->nr_numa_running += (p->numa_preferred_nid != NUMA_NO_NODE);
@@ -2611,6 +2570,47 @@ void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
}
}

+void init_numa_balancing(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ int mm_users = 0;
+ struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
+
+ if (mm) {
+ mm_users = atomic_read(&mm->mm_users);
+ if (mm_users == 1) {
+ mm->numa_next_scan = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay);
+ mm->numa_scan_seq = 0;
+ }
+ }
+ p->node_stamp = 0;
+ p->numa_scan_seq = mm ? mm->numa_scan_seq : 0;
+ p->numa_scan_period = sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay;
+ p->numa_work.next = &p->numa_work;
+ p->numa_faults = NULL;
+ p->numa_group = NULL;
+ p->last_task_numa_placement = 0;
+ p->last_sum_exec_runtime = 0;
+
+ /* New address space, reset the preferred nid */
+ if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_VM)) {
+ p->numa_preferred_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * New thread, keep existing numa_preferred_nid which should be copied
+ * already by arch_dup_task_struct but stagger when scans start.
+ */
+ if (mm) {
+ unsigned int delay;
+
+ delay = min_t(unsigned int, task_scan_max(current),
+ current->numa_scan_period * mm_users * NSEC_PER_MSEC);
+ delay += 2 * TICK_NSEC;
+ p->node_stamp = delay;
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Drive the periodic memory faults..
*/
--
2.22.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-15 12:26    [W:0.066 / U:14.752 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site