lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 048/105] rcu: Force inlining of rcu_read_lock()
Date
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 6da9f775175e516fc7229ceaa9b54f8f56aa7924 ]

When debugging options are turned on, the rcu_read_lock() function
might not be inlined. This results in lockdep's print_lock() function
printing "rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x70" instead of rcu_read_lock()'s caller.
For example:

[ 10.579995] =============================
[ 10.584033] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[ 10.588074] 4.18.0.memcg_v2+ #1 Not tainted
[ 10.593162] -----------------------------
[ 10.597203] include/linux/rcupdate.h:281 Illegal context switch in
RCU read-side critical section!
[ 10.606220]
[ 10.606220] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 10.606220]
[ 10.614280]
[ 10.614280] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
[ 10.620853] 3 locks held by systemd/1:
[ 10.624632] #0: (____ptrval____) (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#5){.+.+}, at: lookup_slow+0x42/0x70
[ 10.633232] #1: (____ptrval____) (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x70
[ 10.640954] #2: (____ptrval____) (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x70

These "rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x70" strings are not providing any useful
information. This commit therefore forces inlining of the rcu_read_lock()
function so that rcu_read_lock()'s caller is instead shown.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index f960c85cd9ec..8d570190e9b4 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
* read-side critical sections may be preempted and they may also block, but
* only when acquiring spinlocks that are subject to priority inheritance.
*/
-static inline void rcu_read_lock(void)
+static __always_inline void rcu_read_lock(void)
{
__rcu_read_lock();
__acquire(RCU);
--
2.20.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-15 17:45    [W:0.504 / U:0.512 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site