Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | [PATCH 11/22] mm/hmm: Do not use list*_rcu() for hmm->ranges | Date | Mon, 1 Jul 2019 08:20:09 +0200 |
| |
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
This list is always read and written while holding hmm->lock so there is no need for the confusing _rcu annotations.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <iweiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com> --- mm/hmm.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c index 0423f4ca3a7e..73c8af4827fe 100644 --- a/mm/hmm.c +++ b/mm/hmm.c @@ -912,7 +912,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range, range->hmm = hmm; kref_get(&hmm->kref); - list_add_rcu(&range->list, &hmm->ranges); + list_add(&range->list, &hmm->ranges); /* * If there are any concurrent notifiers we have to wait for them for @@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range) return; mutex_lock(&hmm->lock); - list_del_rcu(&range->list); + list_del(&range->list); mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock); /* Drop reference taken by hmm_range_register() */ -- 2.20.1
|  |