lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] of/device: add blacklist for iommu dma_ops
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:40 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:35 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:29 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:54 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This solves a problem we see with drm/msm, caused by getting
> > > > iommu_dma_ops while we attach our own domain and manage it directly at
> > > > the iommu API level:
> > > >
> > > > [0000000000000038] user address but active_mm is swapper
> > > > Internal error: Oops: 96000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> > > > Modules linked in:
> > > > CPU: 7 PID: 70 Comm: kworker/7:1 Tainted: G W 4.19.3 #90
> > > > Hardware name: xxx (DT)
> > > > Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
> > > > pstate: 80c00009 (Nzcv daif +PAN +UAO)
> > > > pc : iommu_dma_map_sg+0x7c/0x2c8
> > > > lr : iommu_dma_map_sg+0x40/0x2c8
> > > > sp : ffffff80095eb4f0
> > > > x29: ffffff80095eb4f0 x28: 0000000000000000
> > > > x27: ffffffc0f9431578 x26: 0000000000000000
> > > > x25: 00000000ffffffff x24: 0000000000000003
> > > > x23: 0000000000000001 x22: ffffffc0fa9ac010
> > > > x21: 0000000000000000 x20: ffffffc0fab40980
> > > > x19: ffffffc0fab40980 x18: 0000000000000003
> > > > x17: 00000000000001c4 x16: 0000000000000007
> > > > x15: 000000000000000e x14: ffffffffffffffff
> > > > x13: ffff000000000000 x12: 0000000000000028
> > > > x11: 0101010101010101 x10: 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f
> > > > x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffffffc0fab409a0
> > > > x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000002
> > > > x5 : 0000000100000000 x4 : 0000000000000000
> > > > x3 : 0000000000000001 x2 : 0000000000000002
> > > > x1 : ffffffc0f9431578 x0 : 0000000000000000
> > > > Process kworker/7:1 (pid: 70, stack limit = 0x0000000017d08ffb)
> > > > Call trace:
> > > > iommu_dma_map_sg+0x7c/0x2c8
> > > > __iommu_map_sg_attrs+0x70/0x84
> > > > get_pages+0x170/0x1e8
> > > > msm_gem_get_iova+0x8c/0x128
> > > > _msm_gem_kernel_new+0x6c/0xc8
> > > > msm_gem_kernel_new+0x4c/0x58
> > > > dsi_tx_buf_alloc_6g+0x4c/0x8c
> > > > msm_dsi_host_modeset_init+0xc8/0x108
> > > > msm_dsi_modeset_init+0x54/0x18c
> > > > _dpu_kms_drm_obj_init+0x430/0x474
> > > > dpu_kms_hw_init+0x5f8/0x6b4
> > > > msm_drm_bind+0x360/0x6c8
> > > > try_to_bring_up_master.part.7+0x28/0x70
> > > > component_master_add_with_match+0xe8/0x124
> > > > msm_pdev_probe+0x294/0x2b4
> > > > platform_drv_probe+0x58/0xa4
> > > > really_probe+0x150/0x294
> > > > driver_probe_device+0xac/0xe8
> > > > __device_attach_driver+0xa4/0xb4
> > > > bus_for_each_drv+0x98/0xc8
> > > > __device_attach+0xac/0x12c
> > > > device_initial_probe+0x24/0x30
> > > > bus_probe_device+0x38/0x98
> > > > deferred_probe_work_func+0x78/0xa4
> > > > process_one_work+0x24c/0x3dc
> > > > worker_thread+0x280/0x360
> > > > kthread+0x134/0x13c
> > > > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
> > > > Code: d2800004 91000725 6b17039f 5400048a (f9401f40)
> > > > ---[ end trace f22dda57f3648e2c ]---
> > > > Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
> > > > SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
> > > > Kernel Offset: disabled
> > > > CPU features: 0x0,22802a18
> > > > Memory Limit: none
> > > >
> > > > The problem is that when drm/msm does it's own iommu_attach_device(),
> > > > now the domain returned by iommu_get_domain_for_dev() is drm/msm's
> > > > domain, and it doesn't have domain->iova_cookie.
> > > >
> > > > We kind of avoided this problem prior to sdm845/dpu because the iommu
> > > > was attached to the mdp node in dt, which is a child of the toplevel
> > > > mdss node (which corresponds to the dev passed in dma_map_sg()). But
> > > > with sdm845, now the iommu is attached at the mdss level so we hit the
> > > > iommu_dma_ops in dma_map_sg().
> > > >
> > > > But auto allocating/attaching a domain before the driver is probed was
> > > > already a blocking problem for enabling per-context pagetables for the
> > > > GPU. This problem is also now solved with this patch.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 97890ba9289c dma-mapping: detect and configure IOMMU in of_dma_configure
> > > > Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > This is an alternative/replacement for [1]. What it lacks in elegance
> > > > it makes up for in practicality ;-)
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/264930/
> > > >
> > > > drivers/of/device.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c
> > > > index 5957cd4fa262..15ffee00fb22 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/of/device.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/of/device.c
> > > > @@ -72,6 +72,14 @@ int of_device_add(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> > > > return device_add(&ofdev->dev);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static const struct of_device_id iommu_blacklist[] = {
> > > > + { .compatible = "qcom,mdp4" },
> > > > + { .compatible = "qcom,mdss" },
> > > > + { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-mdss" },
> > > > + { .compatible = "qcom,adreno" },
> > > > + {}
> > > > +};
> > >
> > > Not completely clear to whether this is still needed or not, but this
> > > really won't scale. Why can't the driver for these devices override
> > > whatever has been setup by default?
> > >
> >
> > fwiw, at the moment it is not needed, but it will become needed again
> > to implement per-context pagetables (although I suppose for this we
> > only need to blacklist qcom,adreno and not also the display nodes).
>
> So, another case I've come across, on the display side.. I'm working
> on handling the case where bootloader enables display (and takes iommu
> out of reset).. as soon as DMA domain gets attached we get iommu
> faults, because bootloader has already configured display for scanout.
> Unfortunately this all happens before actual driver is probed and has
> a chance to intervene.
>
> It's rather unfortunate that we tried to be clever rather than just
> making drivers call some function to opt-in to the hookup of dma iommu
> ops :-(

I think it still works for the 90% of cases and if 10% needs some
explicit work in the drivers, that's better than requiring 100% of the
drivers to do things manually.

Adding Marek who had the same problem on Exynos.

Best regards,
Tomasz

>
> BR,
> -R
>
> >
> > The reason is that in the current state the core code creates the
> > first domain before the driver has a chance to intervene and tell it
> > not to. And this results that driver ends up using a different
> > context bank on the iommu than what the firmware expects.
> >
> > I guess the alternative is to put some property in DT.. but that
> > doesn't really feel right. I guess there aren't really many (or any?)
> > other drivers that have this specific problem, so I don't really
> > expect it to be a scaling problem.
> >
> > Yeah, it's a bit ugly, but I'll take a small ugly working hack, over
> > elegant but non-working any day ;-)... but if someone has a better
> > idea then I'm all ears.
> >
> > BR,
> > -R

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-03 08:26    [W:0.170 / U:2.680 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site