lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 00/16] NVIDIA Tegra devfreq improvements and Tegra20/30 support
From
Date
Hi Dmitry,

On 19. 6. 24. 오전 2:17, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 05.06.2019 2:09, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>> 04.06.2019 3:49, Chanwoo Choi пишет:
>>> On 19. 6. 4. 오전 1:52, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> 03.05.2019 3:52, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>>>>> 03.05.2019 3:31, Chanwoo Choi пишет:
>>>>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 19. 5. 2. 오전 8:37, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> v4: Addressed all review comments that were made by Chanwoo Choi to v3:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - changed the driver removal order to match the probe exactly
>>>>>>> - added clarifying comment for 1/8 ratio to the Tegra20 driver
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Chanwoo, please also note that the clk patch that should fix
>>>>>>> compilation problem that was reported the kbuild-test-robot is already
>>>>>>> applied and available in the recent linux-next.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I knew that Stephen picked up your path about clock.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay, good. Thank you very much for reviewing this series! I assume it's
>>>>> too late now for v5.2, but it should be good to go for v5.3.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello Chanwoo,
>>>>
>>>> Will be nice to see the patches in the linux-next before they'll hit mainline. We have tested that
>>>> everything works fine on a selective devices, but won't hurt to get some extra testing beforehand.
>>>> AFAIK, at least NVIDIA people are regularly testing -next on theirs dev boards. Please note that
>>>> this not very important, so don't bother if there is some hurdle with pushing to the tracking branch
>>>> for now. Also please let me know if you're expecting to see some ACK's on the patches, I'm sure
>>>> we'll be able to work out that with Thierry and Jon if necessary.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>> I think that it is enough for applying to mainline branch.
>>> The devfreq.git is maintained by Myungjoo. He will be merged or
>>> reviewed if there are th remained review point.
>>
>> Thank you very much!
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Myungjoo,
>>> I reviewed the Dmitry's patches from v1 to v4 patches.
>>> And then I tested them on my testing branch[1] for catching
>>> the build warning and error. In result, it is clean.
>>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing
>>>
>>> Please review or apply these patches for v5.3.
>>>
>>
>> Hello Myungjoo,
>>
>> I think this patchset should be completed now. Thierry has some extra
>> comments to the patches, but seems nothing critical so far and all the
>> concerns could be addressed in a follow-up series. Please let me know if
>> you're fine with this, I can re-spin v5 as well if necessary.
>>
>
> Hello Chanwoo,
>
> It looks like Myungjoo is inactive at the moment. Do you know if he'll
> be back to the time of the merge window opening or you'll be curating
> the pull request for 5.3 this time?

Myungoo works in the same place. I'll talk with him.

>
> Secondly, I'll send a few more patches on top of this series, addressing
> Thierry's comments and making more improvements. Please let me know if
> this causes any problems and I should re-spin the whole series.

OK. I'll review them.


--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-24 04:17    [W:0.088 / U:0.952 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site