[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH V4 1/2] PCI: dwc: Add API support to de-initialize host
On 6/20/2019 10:22 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:41:26AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi Lorenzo,
>> On 18/06/19 7:58 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 04:21:17PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>> 2) It is not related to this patch but I fail to see the reasoning
>>>>> behind the __ in __dw_pci_read_dbi(), there is no no-underscore
>>>>> equivalent so its definition is somewhat questionable, maybe
>>>>> we should clean-it up (for dbi2 alike).
>>>> Separate no-underscore versions are present in pcie-designware.h for
>>>> each width (i.e. l/w/b) as inline and are calling __ versions passing
>>>> size as argument.
>>> I understand - the __ prologue was added in b50b2db266d8 maybe
>>> Kishon can help us understand the __ rationale.
>>> I am happy to merge it as is, I was just curious about the
>>> __ annotation (not related to this patch).
>> In commit b50b2db266d8a8c303e8d88590 ("PCI: dwc: all: Modify dbi accessors to
>> take dbi_base as argument"), dbi accessors was modified to take dbi_base as
>> argument (since we wanted to write to dbics2 address space). We didn't want to
>> change all the drivers invoking dbi accessors to pass the dbi_base. So we added
>> "__" variant to take dbi_base as argument and the drivers continued to invoke
>> existing dbi accessors which in-turn invoked "__" version with dbi_base as
>> argument.
>> I agree there could be some cleanup since in commit
>> a509d7d9af5ebf86ffbefa98e49761d ("PCI: dwc: all: Modify dbi accessors to access
>> data of 4/2/1 bytes"), we modified __dw_pcie_readl_dbi() to
>> __dw_pcie_write_dbi() when it could have been directly modified to
>> dw_pcie_write_dbi().
> Thanks. Vidya can do it as a preliminary patch, I will merge then
> code to export the symbols.
> Lorenzo
Do you want me to make the change that removes "__" as part of 2/2 patch itself and
then send V5 or as a separate patch?

Vidya Sagar

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-21 07:34    [W:0.053 / U:1.716 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site