lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH][bpf-next] bpf: verifier: add a break statement in switch
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:07 AM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote:
>
> Notice that in this case, it's much clearer to explicitly add a break
> rather than letting the code to fall through. It also avoid potential
> future fall-through warnings[1].
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1087056/
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>

> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 709ce4cef8ba..0b38cc917d21 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -6066,6 +6066,7 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
> range = tnum_range(0, 3);
> enforce_attach_type_range = tnum_range(2, 3);
> }
> + break;
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK:
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR:
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS:
> --
> 2.21.0
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-19 19:45    [W:0.037 / U:27.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site