lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ubsan: mark ubsan_type_mismatch_common inline
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 05:06:39PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:59 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 04:27:45PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> > > On 6/18/19 3:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 4:02 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > > I guess this:
> > > ccflags-y += $(DISABLE_STACKLEAK_PLUGIN)
> >
> > Or more specifically this, I guess:
> >
> > CFLAGS_ubsan.o := $(call cc-option, -fno-conserve-stack -fno-stack-protector) $(DISABLE_STACKLEAK_PLUGIN)
> >
> > we'd not want to exclude all of lib/ from stackleak I figure.
> >
> > Of these two options, I think I prefer the latter, because a smaller
> > whitelist is a better whitelist and since we already disable
> > stack protector, it is only consistent to also disable stack leak.
>
> Ok, sounds good to me. Can you send that upstream then, or should
> I write it up as a proper patch?

If you could verify it actually works that would be great, I haven't
tried to construct a failing .config yet.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-19 09:57    [W:0.035 / U:0.820 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site