lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [v7 PATCH 1/2] mm: vmscan: remove double slab pressure by inc'ing sc->nr_scanned
From
Date


On 6/11/19 10:12 AM, Yang Shi wrote:
>
>
> On 6/10/19 2:36 PM, Oscar Salvador wrote:
>> On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 14:44 +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> The commit 9092c71bb724 ("mm: use sc->priority for slab shrink
>>> targets")
>>> has broken up the relationship between sc->nr_scanned and slab
>>> pressure.
>>> The sc->nr_scanned can't double slab pressure anymore.  So, it sounds
>>> no
>>> sense to still keep sc->nr_scanned inc'ed.  Actually, it would
>>> prevent
>>> from adding pressure on slab shrink since excessive sc->nr_scanned
>>> would
>>> prevent from scan->priority raise.
>> Hi Yang,
>>
>> I might be misunderstanding this, but did you mean "prevent from scan-
>> priority decreasing"?
>> I guess we are talking about balance_pgdat(), and in case
>> kswapd_shrink_node() returns true (it means we have scanned more than
>> we had to reclaim), raise_priority becomes false, and this does not let
>> sc->priority to be decreased, which has the impact that less pages will
>>   be reclaimed the next round.
>
> Yes, exactly.

BTW, for the scan priority, the smaller number the higher priority. So,
either "raise" or "decrease" sounds correct. "raise" means the real
priority, "decrease" means the number itself.

>
>>
>> Sorry for bugging here, I just wanted to see if I got this right.
>>
>>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-11 19:18    [W:0.030 / U:0.560 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site