lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/8] drivers: media: coda: fix warning same module names
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 10:21, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
> On 6/11/19 10:15 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 13:14 +0000, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/06/2019 14:03, Anders Roxell wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 12:13, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 6/6/19 11:47 AM, Anders Roxell wrote:
> >>>>> When building with CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA and CONFIG_CODA_FS enabled as
> >>>>> loadable modules, we see the following warning:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> warning: same module names found:
> >>>>> fs/coda/coda.ko
> >>>>> drivers/media/platform/coda/coda.ko
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Rework so media coda matches the config fragment. Leaving CODA_FS as is
> >>>>> since thats a well known module.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile | 4 ++--
> >>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile b/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile
> >>>>> index 54e9a73a92ab..588e6bf7c190 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile
> >>>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >>>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -coda-objs := coda-common.o coda-bit.o coda-gdi.o coda-h264.o coda-mpeg2.o coda-mpeg4.o coda-jpeg.o
> >>>>> +video-coda-objs := coda-common.o coda-bit.o coda-gdi.o coda-h264.o coda-mpeg2.o coda-mpeg4.o coda-jpeg.o
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA) += coda.o
> >>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA) += video-coda.o
> >>>>
> >>>> How about imx-coda? video-coda suggests it is part of the video subsystem,
> >>>> which it isn't.
> >>>
> >>> I'll resend a v2 shortly with imx-coda instead.
> >
> > I'd be in favor of calling it "coda-vpu" instead.
>
> Fine by me!
>
> >
> >> What about other vendor SoCs implementing the Coda IP block which are
> >> not an imx? I'd prefer a more generic name - maybe media-coda.
> >
> > Right, this driver can be used on other SoCs [1].
>
> Good point.

OK, so I'll change it to 'media-coda'.

Cheers,
Anders

>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> >
> > [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg146498.html
> >
> > regards
> > Philipp
> >
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-11 18:02    [W:0.053 / U:0.596 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site