lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v12 03/13] dt-bindings: Add doc for the Ingenic TCU drivers
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 1:13 PM Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> Le ven. 24 mai 2019 à 22:21, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> a écrit :
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 04:51:31PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> >> Add documentation about how to properly use the Ingenic TCU
> >> (Timer/Counter Unit) drivers from devicetree.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Notes:
> >> v4: New patch in this series. Corresponds to V2 patches 3-4-5
> >> with
> >> added content.
> >>
> >> v5: - Edited PWM/watchdog DT bindings documentation to point to
> >> the new
> >> document.
> >> - Moved main document to
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/ingenic,tcu.txt
> >> - Updated documentation to reflect the new devicetree bindings.
> >>
> >> v6: - Removed PWM/watchdog documentation files as asked by
> >> upstream
> >> - Removed doc about properties that should be implicit
> >> - Removed doc about ingenic,timer-channel /
> >> ingenic,clocksource-channel as they are gone
> >> - Fix WDT clock name in the binding doc
> >> - Fix lengths of register areas in watchdog/pwm nodes
> >>
> >> v7: No change
> >>
> >> v8: - Fix address of the PWM node
> >> - Added doc about system timer and clocksource children nodes
> >>
> >> v9: - Remove doc about system timer and clocksource children
> >> nodes...
> >> - Add doc about ingenic,pwm-channels-mask property
> >>
> >> v10: No change
> >>
> >> v11: Fix info about default value of ingenic,pwm-channels-mask
> >>
> >> v12: Drop sub-nodes for now; they will be introduced in a
> >> follow-up
> >> patchset.
> >
> > Why? I believe I acked them.
>
> The patchset was too big, and I've already been trying to get it
> upstream for
> more than one year now. So I cut it in half in hope that it'll be
> easier to
> upstream it that way.

You can drop the driver part and keep the binding. Unlike drivers, we
don't want bindings to needlessly evolve, and you don't have to wait
til a driver implements some functionality to add that to the binding.

Rob

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-11 16:58    [W:0.041 / U:1.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site