[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH HACK RFC] cpu: Prevent late-arriving interrupts from disrupting offline
On 6/8/19 6:41 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 03:29:32PM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 6/4/19 9:45 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 03:39:18PM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>>>> On 6/3/19 1:44 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 10:38:48AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 06:12:53PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>>>>> Scheduling-clock interrupts can arrive late in the CPU-offline process,


>>> And it looks like the reason I dropped it was that I didn't get any
>>> response from the maintainer. I sent a message to this effect to
>>> and on May
>>> 21, 2015.
>>> So here it is again. ;-)
>>> I have queued this locally. Left to myself, I add the two of you on its
>>> Cc: list and run it through my normal process. But given the history,
>>> I would still want either an ack from the maintainer or, better, for
>>> the maintainer to take the patch.
>>> Or is there a better way for us to proceed on this?
>> You could send this patch also to
>> and cc rmk to get his opinion
>> on the patch.
> OK, please let me know how the testing goes. My thought is to send the
> patch as you suggest with your Tested-by.

Tested your patch on top of v5.2-rc4* on Arm TC2 (32bit) and CPU hotplug
stress test. W/o your patch, the test fails within seconds since CPUs
are not coming up again. W/ your patch, the test runs for hours just fine.

You can add my:

Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <>

* just for the record: one additional unrelated patch (to disable the
NOR flash) is necessary on Arm TC2: .

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-11 15:16    [W:0.096 / U:0.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site