[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] block: fix a crash in do_task_dead()

>>> +
>> Hi Peter, Jen,
>> As we are not taking pi_lock here , is there possibility of same task dead
>> call comes as this point of time for current thread, bcoz of which we have
>> seen earlier issue after this commit 0619317ff8ba
>> [T114538] do_task_dead+0xf0/0xf8
>> [T114538] do_exit+0xd5c/0x10fc
>> [T114538] do_group_exit+0xf4/0x110
>> [T114538] get_signal+0x280/0xdd8
>> [T114538] do_notify_resume+0x720/0x968
>> [T114538] work_pending+0x8/0x10
>> Is there a chance of TASK_DEAD set at this point of time?
> In this case try_to_wake_up(current, TASK_NORMAL) will do nothing, see the
> if (!(p->state & state)) above.
> See also the comment about set_special_state() above. It disables irqs and
> this is enough to ensure that try_to_wake_up(current) from irq can't race
> with set_special_state(TASK_DEAD).

Thanks Oleg,

I missed that part(both thread and interrupt is in same core only), So
that situation would never come.
> Oleg.

Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-11 06:39    [W:0.054 / U:6.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site