lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 74/85] perf time-utils: Treat time ranges consistently
Date
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

Currently, options allow only 1 explicit (non-percentage) time range.
In preparation for adding support for multiple explicit time ranges,
treat time ranges consistently.

Instead of treating some time ranges as inclusive and some as excluding
the end time, treat all time ranges as inclusive. This is only a 1
nanosecond change but is necessary to treat multiple explicit time
ranges in a consistent manner.

Note, there is a later patch that adds a test for time-utils.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604130017.31207-13-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/time-utils.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
index 20663a460df3..1d67cf1216c7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
@@ -389,13 +389,12 @@ bool perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf,
ptime = &ptime_buf[i];

if (timestamp >= ptime->start &&
- ((timestamp < ptime->end && i < num - 1) ||
- (timestamp <= ptime->end && i == num - 1))) {
- break;
+ (timestamp <= ptime->end || !ptime->end)) {
+ return false;
}
}

- return (i == num) ? true : false;
+ return true;
}

int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
--
2.20.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-11 21:15    [W:0.231 / U:16.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site