[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 1/5] signal: Teach sigsuspend to use set_user_sigmask
Oleg Nesterov <> writes:

> On 06/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Personally I don't think anyone sane would intentionally depend on this
>> and I don't think there is a sufficiently reliable way to depend on this
>> by accident that people would actually be depending on it.
> Agreed.
> As I said I like these changes and I see nothing wrong. To me they fix the
> current behaviour, or at least make it more consistent.
> But perhaps this should be documented in the changelog? To make it clear
> that this change was intentional.

Good point. I had not documented it because I thought I was only
disabling an optimization.


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-11 21:15    [W:0.154 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site