lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 2/4] soc: qcom: Add AOSS QMP driver
On Thu 23 May 11:05 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> Quoting Doug Anderson (2019-05-23 09:38:13)
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:38 PM Bjorn Andersson
> > <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +static int qmp_qdss_clk_add(struct qmp *qmp)
> > > +{
> > > + struct clk_init_data qdss_init = {
> > > + .ops = &qmp_qdss_clk_ops,
> > > + .name = "qdss",
> > > + };
> >
> > Can't qdss_init be "static const"? That had the advantage of not
> > needing to construct it on the stack and also of it having a longer
> > lifetime. It looks like clk_register() stores the "hw" pointer in its
> > structure and the "hw" structure will have a pointer here. While I
> > can believe that it never looks at it again, it's nice if that pointer
> > doesn't point somewhere on an old stack.
> >
> > I suppose we could go the other way and try to mark more stuff in this
> > module as __init and __initdata, but even then at least the pointer
> > won't be onto a stack. ;-)
> >
>
> Const would be nice, but otherwise making it static isn't a good idea.
> The clk_init_data structure is all copied over, although we do leave a
> dangling pointer to it stored inside the clk_hw structure we don't use
> it after clk registration. Maybe we should overwrite the pointer with
> NULL once we're done in clk_register() so that clk providers can't use
> it. It might break somebody but would at least clarify this point.
>

I had to read through the clock code to conclude that this was indeed
the design, so I'm happy with your patch of ensuring that this is
followed. Perhaps add a statement in the kerneldoc for struct clk_hw as
well to state that init won't be accessed past the return of
clk_register.

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index aa51756fd4d6..56997a974408 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -3438,9 +3438,9 @@ static int clk_cpy_name(const char **dst_p, const char *src, bool must_exist)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int clk_core_populate_parent_map(struct clk_core *core)
> +static int clk_core_populate_parent_map(struct clk_core *core,
> + const struct clk_init_data *init)
> {
> - const struct clk_init_data *init = core->hw->init;
> u8 num_parents = init->num_parents;
> const char * const *parent_names = init->parent_names;
> const struct clk_hw **parent_hws = init->parent_hws;
> @@ -3520,6 +3520,14 @@ __clk_register(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, struct clk_hw *hw)
> {
> int ret;
> struct clk_core *core;
> + const struct clk_init_data *init = hw->init;
> +
> + /*
> + * The init data is not supposed to be used outside of registration path.
> + * Set it to NULL so that provider drivers can't use it either and so that
> + * we catch use of hw->init early on in the core.
> + */
> + hw->init = NULL;
>
> core = kzalloc(sizeof(*core), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!core) {
> @@ -3527,17 +3535,17 @@ __clk_register(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, struct clk_hw *hw)
> goto fail_out;
> }
>
> - core->name = kstrdup_const(hw->init->name, GFP_KERNEL);
> + core->name = kstrdup_const(init->name, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!core->name) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto fail_name;
> }
>
> - if (WARN_ON(!hw->init->ops)) {
> + if (WARN_ON(!init->ops)) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto fail_ops;
> }
> - core->ops = hw->init->ops;
> + core->ops = init->ops;
>
> if (dev && pm_runtime_enabled(dev))
> core->rpm_enabled = true;
> @@ -3546,13 +3554,13 @@ __clk_register(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, struct clk_hw *hw)
> if (dev && dev->driver)
> core->owner = dev->driver->owner;
> core->hw = hw;
> - core->flags = hw->init->flags;
> - core->num_parents = hw->init->num_parents;
> + core->flags = init->flags;
> + core->num_parents = init->num_parents;
> core->min_rate = 0;
> core->max_rate = ULONG_MAX;
> hw->core = core;
>
> - ret = clk_core_populate_parent_map(core);
> + ret = clk_core_populate_parent_map(core, init);
> if (ret)
> goto fail_parents;
>

I've reviewed this and it looks good!

Regards,
Bjorn

>
> >
> >
> > > +static void qmp_pd_remove(struct qmp *qmp)
> > > +{
> > > + struct genpd_onecell_data *data = &qmp->pd_data;
> > > + struct device *dev = qmp->dev;
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + of_genpd_del_provider(dev->of_node);
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < data->num_domains; i++)
> > > + pm_genpd_remove(data->domains[i]);
> >
> > Still feels like the above loop would be better as:
> > for (i = data->num_domains - 1; i >= 0; i--)
> >
>
> Reason being to remove in reverse order? Otherwise this looks like an
> opinion.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-23 21:51    [W:0.100 / U:10.844 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site